Closing US Bank Accounts

Keybank are increasing the security precautions on their bank accounts. You will need either a US phone number or a "passkey" to log in. Apparently, a virtual phone number won't work, it must be a real mobile phone. Up till now I had a virtual US number, used a friend's address as my mailing address, and used "secret questions" to log in. I tried to set up the passkey but it would only accept US government issued photo IDs. I don't understand why they are so US-centric. Don't they even have Canadian citizens as customers? Once upon a time this was an account at the globally focused HSBC. But mergers and acquisitions moved it to Keybank. This was my bank branch when it was temporarily owned by First Niagara:

So, I moved the money I had out of the accounts to Interactive Brokers. Now I need to get a USD account here in Australia to receive transfers from the US without getting terrible exchange rates. Moominmama has one at HSBC Australia. I might do that, but first I am investigating whether I can get a receiving account at OFX.

Update 4 April

In the end, I decided to go with HSBC Australia as it is a known quantity and setting up a business account with OFX seemed like it might be more complicated than what I need.

Masterworks "Redesigns" Secondary Market

I recently invested USD 5,000 in paintings I bought at large discounts on the Masterworks secondary market. I was thinking to do more such purchases now and then and gradually build up a more diversified portfolio. I targeted offerings that had appreciated since their initial offering and so were more likely to have a near term exit, which were selling at large discounts - up to 50% of appraised value.

Bracco di Ferro by Basquiat

Masterworks was only allowing buy orders to be placed for one day at a time. I think the idea was to force buyers to buy at the offer price and so maybe push prices up. But the result was that someone casually looking at the site saw piles of sell orders and no buy orders and would conclude that this was not a good investment. 

Then today we got an email from Masterworks saying that in future sellers will need to discuss their planned sales with Masterworks and buyers will be offered curated offers. You need to sign a new agreement to participate. From my reading of the agreement, they will charge an extra 2% p.a. AUM fee for participating. I've emailed the firm for clarification on that. If so, I won't participate. I am guessing they plan to buy shares at a discount from sellers and then sell them at a marked up price to buyers.

Recently, I talked to their sales guy who offered me investments in funds. These funds consist of shares in paintings which Masterworks has received as annual management fees. They are offered at a 10% discount to appraised value. The minimum investment for one fund was USD 100k and for the other 25k. I told him I preferred to buy in the secondary market. I guess a bunch of people have told them that. Now maybe the 25k fund looks a little attractive but it also includes paintings that are trading way below their initial offering price that I think might never be exited.

P.S. 16 March 2026

I got an email back from Masterworks saying that they didn't intend to add an additional 2% fee and they will change the wording of the agreement.

Is a Recession and Stockmarket Crash Coming?

There is lots of talk about equities being in a bubble and that a stock-market crash is coming given that unemployment in the US is edging up (though still low) and the Fed is cutting interest rates. From the bullish camp, Anthony Pompliano posted this chart, yesterday:

The number of central banks cutting interest rates usually peaks at stock market bottoms. We look like we are nearing a peak in this variable, but the stock market has been climbing for a couple of years! Based on history, a stock market crash doesn't seem likely, but this is also weird behavior. On the other hand, in 1997-98 the indicator was in positive territory, though falling and the market went sideways, but there is no clearly analogous period. So, I charted the US federal funds rate against the S&P 500 and MSCI World Index total returns indices:

Now, we can find analogies. In 1998, the Fed cut in the wake of the LTCM collapse, but the market went up. Then in late 2019 the Fed started cutting after the yield curve inverted, but the market kept on rising through January 2020, after which the pandemic hit. So, it seems like we are in a similar though longer period. Regarding yield curve inversion, this is where we are:

This shows the difference between the 10 year and 2 year yield. We are in a normal positive yield curve. If the previous yield curve inversion predicted a recession, we should already be in it. On the other hand, maturities shorter than 1 year are higher than the two year yield:

Note that in 1998, the yield curve briefly inverted and then went positive again. It was back into the negative in February 2000. Going negative again now would be a bad sign.

I previously posted that 2025 felt like 1997. Maybe it's 1998. In either case, the base case scenario is that the market will likely rise for a while longer.

1997

I feel that 1997 might be a good analogy to 2025. After an aborted recession in 1994 (2022) the stock market went up strongly in both 1995 (2023) and 1996 (2024). But when I left the US in 1996 for Australia the mood was that the economy was struggling and maybe another recession was coming. There was also a feeling that the stockmarket was overvalued. Alan Greenspan first mentioned "irrational exuberance" in December 1996. But the stockmarket, or at least tech stocks, went up for three more years to crazy heights in 1999 (2027) before the tech wreck. Then the boom was mainly internet related stocks, now AI and maybe quantum computing. Oscar Carboni, who is very slightly older than me, often says: "This boom is just getting started." 

So, does that mean we should go all-in on tech stocks? There are no guarantees, and so I always diversify. My largest exposures to tech are through my venture capital exposures. If I am right, venture capital should do well for a while and maybe we can get some exits. And then I have WCM Global (WCMQ.AX), Generation Global, and Hearts and Minds (HM1.AX). Pershing Square Holdings (PSH.L) has investments in Google and Uber. Unisuper has some exposure through the Sustainable Balanced Option I am mainly invested in. But overall it would only add up to around 15% of net worth (and less of gross assets). On the other hand I have 18% of net worth in crypto-related assets that tend to move with tech stocks. Given that, perhaps my exposure is big enough?

Longwave Small Australian Companies

Recently, what used to be the First Sentier Developing Companies Fund became the Longwave Small Australian Companies Fund. In other words, First Sentier dropped managing the fund and transferred it to Longwave. I checked Longwave's track record and it wasn't that great. So, I decided to close our holdings of this fund. I withdrew part of Moominmama's holding to fund her concessional superannuation contribution for this financial year. Then I wanted to withdraw half of my holding and switch the rest to the FS Imputation Fund that does manage to beat its benchmark. 

As my holding of this fund is under my CommSec margin loan, I had to send the Colonial First State forms requesting the transaction to CommSec. Then CommSec sent me back their own withdrawal form, which was super unclear. Turns out that they have switched 50% of my Longwave holding to FS Imputation. But then instead of withdrawing the rest, they have withdrawn 50% of the rest! I can't be bothered to fill out another set of forms to submit right now as I don't need to withdraw the money...

Insurance Inflation

 

This year's home contents insurance bill is 70% higher than last year's! How does that make sense? The number I am comparing to is one that the company provides that they say is adjusted for any change in policy. This seems particularly egregious but part of a general trend of rising insurance costs.

Comments Stuck in Moderation

I just found that a lot of comments people made in the past were stuck in moderation. I didn't know "sometimes moderation" was on. I approved all the substantive comments and turned moderation off. I apologize to everyone who commented but whose comment wasn't published up till now. I really appreciate all the comments. They made me feel less lonely on this journey.

How Can They Afford It?

One of Moominmama's friends (from undergrad days in the world's most populous country) told her they have bought a house in one of the most expensive neighborhoods here. They plan to knock it down and build their dream home including a swimming pool. It is in walking distance of their two children's school, the most expensive private school here.  Her reasoning is that it costs AUD 4 million to buy an existing house like they want, and this will be cheaper. Still, a crappy house there costs almost AUD 2 million. They haven't sold their existing town house in our neighborhood yet and they apparently also bought her parents an apartment here. She is an administrator at my workplace on probably AUD 100-110k a year and her husband was an associate professor (AUD 150-158k). He recently moved to Moominmama's employer.

 

AUD 3.5 Million House

My immediate reaction was: "How can they afford to do that?" I think Moominmama gets a lot of her aspirations from following this family, including sending our children to private school. 

Real Salary

 

I was wondering whether we were getting worse off over time at my employer and so plotted my real and nominal pre-tax salary for the time I have been in my current position. Halfway along there was a blip where I was department head and got paid more. In real terms I am now about $2000 below where I started in 2011. The union is asking for a 15% increase in the latest bargaining round. After tax that is a about an 11% increase (because of progressive tax rates).

Classic Case of Bad Market Timing

 

At the beginning of the 2020-21 financial year the Macquarie Winton Global Alpha Fund (managed futures) had AUD 1.27 billion in assets. It only returned AUD 1 million that year and had been performing weakly for a while. In the 2020-21 financial year there were net redemptions of AUD 829 million. Then in 2021-22 it made AUD 80 million. There were still net redemptions of AUD 194 million this year and the fund is down to AUD 324 million in assets.

Related-Party Asset

I have been trying to invest in a fund on the AngelList venture capital platform. But my SMSF administrator flagged that there might be issues because the fund is organized as a limited partnership. The auditor has now provided the following information:

"A partnership can elect to be taxed as a Limited Liability Company (LLC) in USA or a partnership under the tax law due to the elections that the LLCs make with the US Internal Revenue Office. It is common for such partnerships (US) to be taxed as a company.

To support compliance with SISA/SISR for investments in Limited partnerships we note the following potential scenarios and information for audit purposes:

1. Where the entity is taxed as an LLC, this supports that the LP should be treated as a company where the members of the Fund are not members of the LP and the investment therefore is considered as an investment in an unrelated entity. This is usually able to be ascertained from the financial report of the LP. 
2. Where the entity is taxed as an LP, and the members of the fund are not members of the LP, and the investment is in within a limited capital account arrangement. This is usually able to be ascertained from the financial report and the application agreements. 
3. Where the entity is taxed as an LP, and the members of the fund are members of the LP.

If the investment falls into scenario 2 and 3 then the investment would classified as an in-house asset which would mean it needs to be below 5% of the SMSF’s total assets."

It seems that this falls under scenario 3. I just sent AngelList an email to check. The problem is that the minimum investment required, let alone subsequent hoped for appreciation, would take us over the 5% limit. So, it seems it is not really true that you can invest in anything you like through an SMSF. It seems silly to me to treat a fund where I am only investing through the SMSF along with 1500 other investors as a "related-party asset". Probably, I will need to invest in this fund using my own name and pay higher tax than I would through the SMSF.

Still Trying to Transfer Shares

So, I have been trying to transfer our holdings of listed investment trusts from our SMSF's Interactive Brokers account to a new account I set up with Commonwealth Securities. I first sent the required form to Commonwealth Securities 6 weeks ago. After nothing happened for three weeks I emailed them again. They then sent me the next day a text message telling me to phone. They told me that I needed to change some details on the form. I sent a new form in. Again nothing. Yesterday, I again emailed them. Today, they again texted me and I phoned them. They said that Interactive Brokers were not accepting the transfer and I should initiate it at that broker instead. I have just done that. All online of course, no paper forms required. Let's see if it works. I don't want to have to sell and rebuy the shares again as there is a AUD 34k capital gain plus two sets of commissions and slippage. 

But this service from CommSec where they just forget about the request for 3 weeks until they are reminded again is really not good!

P.S. 6Apr22

Success! The shares have arrived at CommSec.