Markets rebounded this month, but they rebounded a lot less in Australia than in the rest of the world. This was partly because of a strong rebound in the Australian Dollar from USD 0.6880 to USD 0.7179. Gold fell a little in USD terms and quite a lot in AUD terms. Here is the performance of our benchmarks (total returns including dividends):
US Dollar Indices
MSCI World Index (gross): 10.21%
S&P 500: 10.49%
HFRI Hedge Fund Index (forecast): 2.71%
Australian Dollar Benchmarks
ASX 200: 2.19%
Target Portfolio (forecast): 1.97%
Australian 60/40 benchmark: 2.44%
In Australian Dollar terms we gained 2.88% and in US Dollar terms we gained 7.35%. So we outperformed all AUD benchmarks and HFRI but underperformed relative to the two USD stock indices. Our SMSF gained 4.62%. Unisuper gained 4.49% and PSS(AP) 2.34%. So, we outperformed one of our superannuation benchmarks.
Here is a report on the performance of investments by asset class:
The asset class returns are in currency neutral terms as the rate of return on gross assets and do not include investment expenses such as margin interest, and so the total differs from the Australian Dollar returns on net assets mentioned above. Gold and Australian small cap lost money but all other asset classes gained. Futures were the best performer while hedge funds made the greatest contribution.
Things that worked well this month:
- Nine investments gained more than AUD 10k: L1 Global Long-Short (GLS.AX, 42k), Unisuper (35k), Australian Dollar Futures (35k), Pershing Square Holdings (PSH.L, 19k), Acadian Global Long-Short (19k), PSS(AP) (15k), Pengana Private Equity (PE1.AX, 15k), CREF Social Choice (11k), and Hearts and Minds (HM1.AX, 11k).
What really didn't work:
- Only three investments lost money with gold losing 28k.
We moved towards our target allocation. Our actual allocation currently looks like this:
Moominmama receives employer superannuation contributions every two weeks. We also make monthly concessional contributions to Moominmama's superannuation to reach the annual cap on contributions. There will still be capital calls from Aura Venture Fund II and III. I am receiving monthly pension payments from both Unisuper and our SMSF totalling AUD 5,150 per month. I was again less active in the market, making the following investment and trade moves this month:
- I reinvested a distribution at Masterworks and invested USD 2k in another startup at Unpopular Ventures on Angellist. We are no longer subscribing to their rolling fund but will invest a little in promising startups that they syndicate.
- I sold 1,000 shares of PMGOLD.AX (10 ounces) and then bought back in again at a lower price, but not low enough, as the price has fallen more.
- I bought another 10k shares in WAM Alternatives (WMA.AX).
Here are the income and spending accounts * for this month:
Other income includes Moominmama's salary and employer superannuation contributions and totalled AUD 4k as usual. It was a big spending month at AUD 19k due to school fees. This number does not include our mortgage payments, which are regarded here as saving and investment costs. Dissaving amounted to AUD 15k, within the 4% rule limit of AUD 23k. We gained AUD 193k investing, 2/3 of which were was in retirement accounts. They performed better both on the way down and the way up from the March correction than our non-retirement accounts and are now higher than in February. We received lots of dividends with associated franking credits this month. As a result of all this, net worth rose by AUD 162k to AUD 8.309 million. We are about AUD 100k above the beginning of the year, but this is mainly due to the increase in the value of our house.
* Results are shown separately for retirement and non-retirement accounts as well as housing, which nowadays doesn't have much activity. The grey shaded rows are additional notes. Total investment income is split into investment income before exchange rate moves and the contribution of exchange rates. Other income is non-investment income including salaries, employer superannuation contributions, and net tax returns. Investment income is shown pre-tax. Tax credits include franking credits on Australian Dividends and imputed tax on industry superannuation returns and and actual SMSF tax. These are taken away from investment income to get changes in actual net worth. Inheritances include gifts from relatives. Saving is from non-investment income, transfers, and inheritances.
















.jpg)


























An interesting post from Financial Samurai or how closed-end funds trade. A closed-end fund is one that trades on a stock exchange but has a fixed number of shares on a day to day basis.* They may occasionally do additional share issues, or reinvest dividends, or even buy back shares, but they don't buy and sell shares continuously to keep the market price at the net asset value or NAV. ETFs, by contrast, do continually create or redeem new shares to keep the market price close to NAV. I posted a comment about where the equilibrium price of a closed-end fund should be that I thought was worth its own post here.
In theory, if the fund manager grows the NAV of the fund with distributions reinvested faster than the average stock market rate of return (for assets with similar beta), then a closed end fund should trade higher than NAV and vice versa.
This should be the equilibrium price, so that investors don’t get a free lunch of a higher than average return or conversely a worse than average return. If the average fund manager performs the same as the market before fees then on average after fees managers will under-perform the market and so the typical closed end fund will trade at a discount to NAV.
Of course, actual prices often deviate from this equilibrium for a long time! Pershing Square Holdings, which trades on the LSE, is a classic case. It has either outperformed or matched S&P 500 performance over the last few years while investing mainly in large cap US stocks, but trades at a massive discount to NAV. As an investor, one of my reasons for investing was this large discount. We’ve experienced good returns but not much closing of the discount. In fact the discount today is the same as it was in 2021 when we finished buying our current position. The market price is 25% below NAV! Our internal rate of return has been 20%, which is clearly better than the stock market average. The S&P 500 has returned 15% p.a. over the last ten years or 14% over the last five. So, it is crazy that the discount hasn't at least narrowed.
* Sometimes people refer to unlisted private equity funds that raise a given amount of money and then invest it as closed end funds too.