How Well Did Your Super Fund Do in 2025?

The Australian reports on superannuation funds' performance for calendar year 2025. Neither of our employer funds - Unisuper and PSS(AP) - made the top ten. Unisuper Balanced is in the top 10 for the last 10 years. The average return for 2025 was between 8.8% and 9.3% depending on the source. I assume this is for accumulation funds. I estimate that Unisuper made 7.8% pre-tax or around 6.8% post-tax. PSS(AP) made 10.5% or 9.2% post-tax. On the other hand, our SMSF returned -6.1% pre-tax :( This is mostly because of its outperformance in 2024 (34.0%) and cryptocurrency coming back down to Earth in 2025.

Little My 2025 Investment Performance

Little My (our second child) had a good year investment-wise:

His estimated pre-tax return was 20.84%.* The ASX200 had a gross return including estimated franking credits of 11.86%. The MSCI gross world index returned 16.93% and our target portfolio has an estimated return of 10.01%. 

 

Seems like I have finally managed to put together a decent portfolio for him. Currently, we have 33% in the L1 Long Short Fund, 28% in the Dimensional 70/30 fund, 10% in Generation Life Tax Effective Australian Shares, and the remainder in two Magellan fund options.

 

* 30% tax is deducted automatically from the returns of "investment bonds".  However, there is a trick that could reduce this tax to the recipient's marginal tax rate when the bond is finally cashed out. By adding an additional payment the ten year period of investment that is needed to get the 30% rate will be reset. This makes sense if the recipient has a marginal rate below 30%. This works because additional contributions have to be within 125% of the previous year's contribution in order not to reset the bond. Given that our additional contributions since the initial investment have been zero...

 

December 2025 Report

December was the first post-retirement month. I am changing the layout of these reports to remove investment performance over the last five years and add in the income and spending report I dropped back in 2018. This is because I have a new focus on making sure spending stays within our budget, whereas it is hard to change investment performance over a five year period on a monthly basis. I will report on longer term investment performance in the annual review as usual.

In December, the Australian Dollar rose from USD 0.6550 to USD 0.6674 meaning that USD investment returns are better than AUD investment returns. We had a good month in terms of investment return. Stock markets were slightly up with a lot of intramonth volatility (total returns including dividends):

US Dollar Indices

MSCI World Index (gross): 1.07%

S&P 500: 0.06%

HFRI Hedge Fund Index: 0.26% (forecast)

Australian Dollar Benchmarks

ASX 200: 1.36%

Target Portfolio: -0.19% (forecast - depends on HFRI result)

Australian 60/40 benchmark: 0.22%

We gained 1.28% in Australian Dollar terms or 3.28% in US Dollar terms. So we outperformed all benchmarks apart from the ASX 200, which we got fairly close to.  These returns are preliminary, as we won't get results from Aura Venture for more than a month, and Angellist report with a three month lag. I was curious about how much I end up revising my monthly performance figures when all the data is available. Here are the results for the last year:

"Original" is the rate of return reported in this blog and "Current" is my current estimate. In the last year, on average I overestimated the rate of return initially. On the other hand, I initially underestimated the return for last December but as you can see I have already trimmed this December's number a little.

The SMSF again outperformed, returning 0.62% beating Unisuper (0.37%) and PSS(AP) (0.40%). 

Here is a report on the performance of investments by asset class:

The asset class returns are in currency neutral terms as the rate of return on gross assets and do not include investment expenses such as margin interest, and so the total differs from the Australian Dollar returns on net assets mentioned above. Only US stocks lost money. Futures had the highest rate of return with Australian Dollar Futures contributing the most. Hedge funds made the largest overall contribution.

Things that worked well this month:

• As mentioned above, most hedge funds did well with Tribeca Global Resources (TGF.AX) gaining AUD 42k and Regal Investment Fund (RF1.AX) 17k. Gold, 3i (III.L), and Cadence Opportunities (CDO.AX) all gained between AUD 9 and 10k.

What really didn't work:

• Only five investments lost money and no investment lost more than AUD 10k.

We moved towards our target allocation. Our actual allocation currently looks like this:

About 65% of our portfolio is in what are often considered to be alternative assets: real estate, art, hedge funds, private equity, gold, and futures. A lot of these are listed investments or investments with daily liquidity, so our portfolio is not as illiquid as you might think.

Moominmama receives employer superannuation contributions every two weeks. We also make monthly concessional contributions to Moominmama's superannuation to reach the annual cap on contributions. I made the last USD 10k contribution to the Unpopular Ventures Rolling Fund this month. There will still be capital calls from Aura Venture Fund II and III. I am receiving monthly TTR pension payments from both Unisuper and our SMSF. I will decide how much to recontribute to superannuation later in the financial year. 

This was a quieter month in terms of transactions:

• I sold 5k WAM Capital (WAM.AX) shares.
• I bought net 1k shares of WCM Global Quality (WCMQ.AX). 
• I sold 250 Perth Mint Gold ETF (PMGOLD.AX) shares. 
• I sold all our position in WAM Strategic Value (WAR.AX, 100k shares) in order to fund the 1:1 entitlement offer for the L1 Global Long Short Fund (GLS.AX, formerly Platinum Capital, 85k new shares). 

Here are the income and spending accounts for this month:

Results are shown separately for retirement and non-retirement accounts as well as housing, which nowadays doesn't have much activity. The grey lines are additional notes. Total investment income is split into investment income before exchange rate moves and the contribution of exchange rates. Other income is non-investment income including salaries, employer superannuation contributions, and net tax returns. Investment income is shown pre-tax. Tax credits include franking credits on Australian Dividends and imputed tax on superannuation returns. These are taken away from investment income to get changes in actual net worth. Inheritances include gifts from relatives. Saving is from non-investment income, transfers, and inheritances.

This month, salary hit a record number as I received the redundancy payment of more than AUD 1/4 million. Spending was fairly average at AUD 12k. There was a larger than normal transfer out of superannuation as I made excess concessional superannuation contributions in the previous tax year, which I withdrew from Unisuper. We received a cash gift from Muminmama's father (counted as inheritance). As a result of all this, net worth increased by AUD 347k, almost all of it in non-retirement accounts. Now, I will have to decide how much to contribute to superannuation. I want to hit the goal of transferring AUD 2 million to a tax free pension account. I also want to max out the concessional contribution cap of AUD 30k for this year to help reduce my taxes, which will be very high because of the redundancy payment. The payment itself has low taxes but it pushes most of the rest of my income into the top tax bracket.

To keep things simple, I will use net worth at the end of this month as the "retirement number". Net worth at the end of December not including our house is AUD 6.875 million. Using the 4% rule means we could dissave AUD 275k per annum. Our spending is a lot below that. Total net worth is AUD 8.112 million.

A More Realistic Target Portfolio

A couple of changes to the target portfolio. There are really two target portfolios. One is our desired asset allocation and the other is the benchmark portfolio I compare performance to each month and year. 

The first change applies to the benchmark portfolio. Up till now, I have used the FTSE DSC venture and buyout indices as the proxy for venture capital and buyout PE. But these indices track gross performance before investment fees. Investment fees are very high for these asset classes and it is unrealistic to assume I could match the gross performance. By contrast, the HFRI index I use for hedge funds is net performance after fees. So, I am going to apply the standard 2 and 20 investment fee structure to the returns of these indices. 2 refers to the 2% annual management fee and 20 refers to the carried interest or performance fee - 20% of the profits. 

There is actually a big difference between hedge funds and private equity in how these fees are applied. Hedge funds charge 2% of NAV each year and 20% of the profit above a hurdle rate of return. Usually, if gross profits are in a drawdown - below the previous "high water mark" - no performance fee would be charged. Private equity charges 2% of the original investment and only charges carried interest when an investment is realised - but usually there is no hurdle rate. I will deduct 2%/12 of NAV each month and 20% of profits when gross profits are above the high water mark. I implement this by computing the gross index and then a high water mark index - the maximum of the gross index in all previous months. If the gross index at the end of the month is above the the high water mark, 20% of the percentage increase relative to the high water mark is deducted from returns.* This exaggerates likely fees. On the other hand, I don't take into account the dilution that often happens to early stage venture investors. 

Venture returns are reduced from 1.67% per month gross since January 2008 to 1.22% net and buyout returns fall from 1.29% to 0.93%. These returns are still better than any other asset class.

I have also tweaked the allocations to give 20% to each of long public equity, hedge funds, and private equity. I have also increased the credit allocation to 10%. So, the benchmark portfolio consists of:

MSCI All Country World Index Gross in AUD 9%  

ASX 200 Total Return Index 11%

HFRI Fund Weighted Hedge Fund Index 20%

Net FTSE Venture Index 10% 

Net FTSE Buyout Index 10%

Gold Spot Price in AUD 10% 

TIAA Real Estate Fund 12%

CREF Bond Fund 10%

Winton Global Alpha Fund 5%

Australian Dollar Cash 3%

Short Australian Dollar Futures 31% 

The index is effectively rebalanced monthly.

The 31% short Australian Dollar position is half the total position in hedge funds, private equity, real estate, and bonds. The indices or funds for each of these is in US Dollars. This hedge implies that half of the allocation to these assets is in Australian Dollar denominated funds and half in US Dollar denominated funds.

Our target allocation for investment is close to this. We split the Australian stock allocation into 7% large cap and 4% small cap. Real assets, credit, and futures categories are also broader than the specific funds listed here.

I won't bother deducting fees from the long stocks allocation as you could use ETFs with very low fees to track these indices. 

Here is a graph of the simulated performance of the benchmark since September 1996:

The benchmark has about matched the returns of the MSCI index and gold with a lot less volatility. My own performance was terrible up to 2012 and has tracked the benchmark pretty well since then (it's a log chart). Here is a comparison of the benchmark, myself, and the Vanguard 60/40 benchmark since the latter funds inception:

 

* A simpler approach is just to multiply the gross return by 0.8 and deduct 2%/12 each month. The result of this approach is highly correlated with the high water mark approach. The high water mark approach is more realistic though. Let's say you invested $1000 and gross performance was 100%. Your account now has $1800 and the manager has $200. Now the gross price falls by 10%. Both your share and the manager's share fall by 10%. It would be incorrect to say that your $1800 fell by only 8%.