Alerian Master Limited Partnership ETF

I made a small investment of 500 shares of this ETF in the SMSF. It is an ETF of master limited partnerships, which are entities owning pipelines in the US. So, this counts towards my real assets allocation. It pays a high dividend of 7.8%, so it contributes towards our income investments that are intended to fund the SMSF pension. In recent years, since the pandemic it has performed well with a relatively low beta and high alpha to the stock market. So, it counts towards my "passive alpha" category as well. In the long-term though it has tracked the price of oil to quite a large degree and so isn't a set and forget investment. But I expect that in the near future energy demand to generate electricity for AI will be growing.

Bad Timing Switching Funds

In May last year, I switched from the Aspect Diversified Futures Fund to the Acadian Global Long Short Fund in our SMSF.* Since then Aspect has done very well:

I sold almost right at the bottom. It has gained more than 25% since then! What has Acadian done? It has risen a bit and then fallen:

Maybe a 3% gain :( The longer term performance has been really good though. If I had stuck to our target allocation, I would have kept Aspect and done better. I'm not going to switch back now. It's just as likely that Aspect falls again and Acadian continues its long term trajectory.

* The linked post talks about switching from Generation Global to Acadian. That was in another account. We switched to Acadian in two accounts. Generation rose about 12% after the switch but has now nose-dived to be down about 4%. So, that switch made sense.

Local Auction Boosts Our Estimated Net Worth

I went to the auction of a townhouse within my data catchment that I use to estimate the value of our home:

 

It sold for AUD 920k with two serious bidders. When I plug the number into my model, it boosts the value of our house by around AUD 250k, which seems crazy! As more data rolls in for this year, I think the estimated price will go down.

This was a popular TV show when I was in primary school:

 

That was worth a lot more back then.😀

ZIM

 

I bought 2000 shares of ZIM. A takeover was announced by Hapag-Lloyd, but the shares are trading about 25% the acquisition price based on the fear that the Israeli government wouldn't approve the deal and that the workers have announced a strike over job losses. But part of the company will be carved out and sold to an Israeli private equity firm to assuage this concern. Presumably, some sweetener will be found for the workers. In the meantime, the company will hopefully continue to pay its very high dividends. The price has been in the doldrums because shipping rates are currently low and presumably there is geopolitical risk. Potentially, the EU could be concerned about the merger. Well, this is just a 1% speculative position.

Update 19 Feb 26

Well that didn't last long. I saw this article and immediately dumped my position for a USD 333 profit. It's hard to believe that Hapag-Lloyd didn't discuss this with the Israeli government before structuring this deal. But I don't want to risk losing money on this.

More Good Venture Capital News

I recently reported that my investment in the Aura VF2 fund was now in profit. Now, our Angellist investments through Unpopular Ventures have swung into profitability too:

 

There is a 3 month lag in reporting values. We invest in their Rolling Fund as well as individual firms. One of those firms is now reporting that it is worth 9.5x the value I invested at. On the other hand, two companies I invested in have effectively gone to zero. While I am excited to not be losing money any more, our overall IRR on our Angellist investments is only 2.76% so far. 

But this is an AUD 60k bump in value that makes a substantive change to our numbers for 2025. It pushes up our 2025 rate of return to 9.68% in AUD terms or 18.14% in USD terms. That puts us just ahead of the S&P 500 for the year:

The "retirement number" rises to AUD 7.011 million. Total net worth at the end of the year Was AUD 8.252 million, which is comfortably ahead of the base case net worth projection of AUD 8.2 million. Also, the private equity return for the year roses to 9.3% from 4.7%! The annual contribution to total return from private equity was 1.8% instead of 0.9%. Unpopular Ventures returned AUD 40,118 for the year, making it our 8th best investment.

How Closed-End Funds Should Trade in Theory

An interesting post from Financial Samurai or how closed-end funds trade. A closed-end fund is one that trades on a stock exchange but has a fixed number of shares on a day to day basis.* They may occasionally do additional share issues, or reinvest dividends, or even buy back shares, but they don't buy and sell shares continuously to keep the market price at the net asset value or NAV. ETFs, by contrast, do continually create or redeem new shares to keep the market price close to NAV. I posted a comment about where the equilibrium price of a closed-end fund should be that I thought was worth its own post here.

In theory, if the fund manager grows the NAV of the fund with distributions reinvested faster than the average stock market rate of return (for assets with similar beta), then a closed end fund should trade higher than NAV and vice versa. 

This should be the equilibrium price, so that investors don’t get a free lunch of a higher than average return or conversely a worse than average return. If the average fund manager performs the same as the market before fees then on average after fees managers will under-perform the market and so the typical closed end fund will trade at a discount to NAV.

Of course, actual prices often deviate from this equilibrium for a long time! Pershing Square Holdings, which trades on the LSE, is a classic case. It has either outperformed or matched S&P 500 performance over the last few years while investing mainly in large cap US stocks, but trades at a massive discount to NAV. As an investor, one of my reasons for investing was this large discount. We’ve experienced good returns but not much closing of the discount. In fact the discount today is the same as it was in 2021 when we finished buying our current position. The market price is 25% below NAV! Our internal rate of return has been 20%, which is clearly better than the stock market average. The S&P 500 has returned 15% p.a. over the last ten years or 14% over the last five. So, it is crazy that the discount hasn't at least narrowed.

* Sometimes people refer to unlisted private equity funds that raise a given amount of money and then invest it as closed end funds too.